This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Hi {{first_name|there}},

Over the last few weeks we looked at becoming a more strategic leader. This week we start a new series on leading up and across the organisation, and we begin with organisational politics.

Let's face it, organisational politics are a nightmare and, for most of us, they are something we instinctively want to avoid.

And that is no surprise when you consider these well-used definitions of organisational politics:

  • "individual or group behavior that is informal, ostensibly parochial, typically divisive, and above all, in the technical sense, illegitimate" (Mintzberg, 1983, p. 172), and

  • "a form of employee behavior that uses power strategically to achieve outcomes and maximize self-interests that do not necessarily match the organization's goals" (Ferris et al., 2002).

'Parochial', 'divisive', 'illegitimate', 'maximise self-interest'. No wonder this stuff can make your skin crawl.

So, it is tempting to keep your head down, do good work and hope that the work speaks for itself.

But staying out of politics does not stop it happening around you, and if you are not alive to what is going on, it can harm both you and your team.

The secret is to engage with the politics in a way that is consistent with your own values, and a lot of the ideas we have previously covered in relation to strategic leadership will help you here.

Separating political skill from political climate

As a starting point it is worth making the distinction between a political climate in an organisation and political skill.

A political climate arises where people believe that key decisions about things like resources, appointments, work allocation and so on are driven by self-interest and favouritism. Studies show that perceptions of political climate are linked to lower job satisfaction, lower commitment, higher stress and intentions to quit (Miller et al., 2008; Bedi & Schat, 2013), and, in particular, to lower levels of trust in the organisation (Bedi & Schat, 2013).

Political skill, on the other hand, is very different, with different associations.

Political skill is "the ability to effectively understand others at work, and to use such knowledge to influence others to act in ways that enhance one's personal and/or organizational objectives" (Ferris, Treadway, et al., 2005, p. 127).

Note the absence of concepts like divisiveness and self-interest. Political skill is neutral; it can be used negatively but in the right hands it is a key leadership strength.

Political skill is associated with better performance, career success, job satisfaction and lower strain (Munyon et al., 2015). And it helps teams too: in one study of child welfare teams, the political skill of the team leader explained a significant part of how successful the teams were at placing children in permanent homes, even after allowing for caseloads and experience (Ahearn et al., 2004).

So, in my view, the best way to approach organisational politics is not to ignore them, but to develop and enhance your political skill so that you can satisfactorily avoid creating or contributing to perceptions of a political climate.

Why is political skill hard to learn?

Gerald Ferris and his colleagues describe political skill as having four parts (Ferris, Davidson, & Perrewé, 2005):

  • Social astuteness: understanding people and what is going on around you at work.

  • Interpersonal influence: being able to persuade people, and adapting your approach to the person in front of you.

  • Networking ability: building relationships and using them to get things done.

  • Apparent sincerity: coming across as genuine, without hidden motives.

The difficulty is that none of these is a technique you can easily pick up from a book. Even the researchers say the evidence does not yet explain very well how or why it works (Kimura, 2015).

What we do know is how leaders say they learned it. When Sophie Yates and Jean Hartley surveyed mainly senior public sector managers in the UK, Australia and New Zealand, the sources of political astuteness they valued most were unplanned experiences, rather than formal training (Yates & Hartley, 2021). NHS leaders told a similar story. They mostly built their political skill gradually, through the experience of leading and changing services (Waring et al., 2023).

So, we mostly learn this by doing it. But that does not mean you have to leave it to chance.

How to develop your political awareness and skill

Here are four things you can do to speed up the learning.

1. Treat the politics as part of the work. Before your next important decision or request, take a few minutes to think about who cares about it and why. Whose goals does it help? Whose does it get in the way of? This is the perspective taking we looked at in our series on strategic leadership and in the post on managing up. But noticing is only the start. In the research, social astuteness on its own did not predict performance, while networking, influence and sincerity did (Munyon et al., 2015). So, use what you notice to have the conversations that need to happen.

2. Take on work that crosses boundaries. Since experience is the main way we learn this, it makes sense to look for the experiences that will help. You could volunteer for a cross-team project, offer to stand in for your boss at a meeting, join a working group with another function or take a small part in a change initiative. Pay real attention to how decisions actually get made, as opposed to how the process says they get made.

3. Find a coach or mentor and talk it through afterwards. The NHS leaders said mentors were important for reflecting on their own experiences and fine-tuning their approach (Waring et al., 2023). And, in another study, people who had a mentor reported higher political skill than those who did not (Chopin et al., 2012). Choose somebody who understands how your organisation really works, and after a meeting that went well or badly, ask yourself questions like:

  • What did I notice about what people wanted?

  • Whose interests were in play that nobody mentioned?

  • Who did I need to speak to beforehand?

  • What would I do differently next time?

Over time, you'll want to get to the position where you are asking these questions before the meeting, rather than after it.

4. Give yourself permission to talk about it. The same healthcare leaders said that where they did engage in relevant formal learning, it helped mostly because it gave them permission to discuss political issues openly, and a way of making sense of them (Waring et al., 2023). So, a course or a book can help, as long as you get the chance to discuss what you are learning in the context of your own situation.

How to use political skill ethically

As noted above, political skill can be used badly. It can help people hide self-serving tendencies from their colleagues (Blickle et al., 2020), for example. So, it is important to think carefully about how you use it.

Here are some ways to keep yourself honest:

  • Ask who benefits, and whether you could do it in the open. In one study, people saw political behaviour as positive when a group benefited rather than an individual, and when the process was transparent (Butler et al., 2019). If you would be embarrassed for your team to see how you got something, consider that a warning sign.

  • Keep it soft and consistent. Leaders' "soft" political behaviour built trust and helpfulness in their teams, while "hard" political behaviour reduced those things (Kwon et al., 2024). Influence tactics that clashed with a leader's usual style also undermined how their team saw them (Mahajan & Templer, 2021).

  • Don't overplay it. When people worked hard on the impression they made, the politically skilled got better ratings from their supervisors than those without the skill who used the same tactics (Harris et al., 2007). So, if it doesn't come naturally to you, don't try too hard. And politically skilled bosses are good at spotting flattery, which then damages your reputation (Wu et al., 2013).

  • Lower the temperature for your team. You can reduce how political things feel in your own part of the organisation. Where supervisors and colleagues give plenty of informal feedback, people see less politics, because they know what is actually valued (Rosen et al., 2006). This is one more reason to make sure your team knows what good looks like. Fair decision-making processes also reduce the effect that covert, self-serving politics has on people's intention to leave (Byrne, 2005).

Why this matters

Politics is, to a large extent, what happens when people see the same situation from different perspectives and want different things from it.

Used well, political skill reflects the idea of dialogue we looked at last week. That means suspending your own view for a while, understanding the other person's position properly, staying in the tension and looking for a bigger shared perspective that more people can support. It helps you get things done with other people in a way that they can live with too.

You probably won't learn it quickly, and you will get some of it wrong along the way.

But if you pay attention to what you experience and talk it through with somebody you trust, you will get better at it. And if you keep asking who benefits and how this will look, you will be able to feel good about how you use it.

And your team will be better off for it.

References are in the website version of this post.

References

Ahearn, K. K., Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Douglas, C., & Ammeter, A. P. (2004). Leader political skill and team performance. Journal of Management, 30(3), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.01.004

Bedi, A., & Schat, A. C. H. (2013). Perceptions of organizational politics: A meta-analysis of its attitudinal, health, and behavioural consequences. Canadian Psychology, 54(4), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034549

Blickle, G., Kückelhaus, B. P., Kranefeld, I., Schütte, N., Genau, H. A., Gansen-Ammann, D.-N., & Wihler, A. (2020). Political skill camouflages Machiavellianism: Career role performance and organizational misbehavior at short and long tenure. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118, Article 103401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103401

Butler, W., Decker, G., Peters, J., Thomas, A., & Merritt, S. M. (2019). Positive organizational politics: A grounded theory study [Preprint]. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3454066

Byrne, Z. S. (2005). Fairness reduces the negative effects of organizational politics on turnover intentions, citizenship behavior and job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(2), 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-005-8258-0

Chopin, S. M., Danish, S. J., Seers, A., & Hook, J. N. (2012). Effects of mentoring on the development of leadership self-efficacy and political skill. Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(3), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21253

Ferris, G. R., Adams, G., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ammeter, A. P. (2002). Perceptions of organizational politics: Theory and research directions. In F. J. Yammarino & F. Dansereau (Eds.), The many faces of multi-level issues (Research in multi-level issues, Vol. 1, pp. 179–254). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.

Ferris, G. R., Davidson, S. L., & Perrewé, P. L. (2005). Political skill at work: Impact on work effectiveness. Davies-Black.

Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., Douglas, C., & Frink, D. D. (2005). Development and validation of the political skill inventory. Journal of Management, 31(1), 126–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304271386

Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., Zivnuska, S., & Shaw, J. D. (2007). The impact of political skill on impression management effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.278

Kimura, T. (2015). A review of political skill: Current research trend and directions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(3), 312–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12041

Kwon, H. R., Seol, J. H., Kang, Y. J., & Sohn, Y. W. (2024). Ambivalent effects of leader's organizational political behavior on subordinate's organizational citizenship behavior: A dyadic study. Current Psychology, 43(47), 35914–35928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07074-2

Mahajan, A. Y., & Templer, A. J. (2021). Leader political skill, influence tactics, and member performance: Supplementary, complementary and contrasting perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 133, 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.049

Miller, B. K., Rutherford, M. A., & Kolodinsky, R. W. (2008). Perceptions of organizational politics: A meta-analysis of outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9061-5

Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Prentice-Hall.

Munyon, T. P., Summers, J. K., Thompson, K. M., & Ferris, G. R. (2015). Political skill and work outcomes: A theoretical extension, meta-analytic investigation, and agenda for the future. Personnel Psychology, 68(1), 143–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12066

Rosen, C. C., Levy, P. E., & Hall, R. J. (2006). Placing perceptions of politics in the context of the feedback environment, employee attitudes, and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.211

Waring, J., Bishop, S., Clarke, J. M., Exworthy, M., Fulop, N., Hartley, J., Ramsay, A. I. G., Black, G. B., & Roe, B. (2023). Acquiring and developing healthcare leaders' political skills: An interview study with healthcare leaders. BMJ Leader, 7(1), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2022-000617

Wu, L.-Z., Kwan, H. K., Wei, L., & Liu, J. (2013). Ingratiation in the workplace: The role of subordinate and supervisor political skill. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 991–1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12033

Yates, S., & Hartley, J. (2021). Learning to lead with political astuteness. International Public Management Journal, 24(4), 562–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2021.1894281

More leadership inspiration

What Next?

All of my posts for new leaders are here.

How I can help you

Coaching. If you are finding the political side of your role hard, or you are not sure how to get what your team needs without compromising your values, I can help. Talking through what you are seeing with somebody outside your organisation is one of the quickest ways to learn this.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate